FishingTN.com Tennessee's Fishing and Boating Community

Go Back   FishingTN.com Tennessee's Fishing and Boating Community > Fishing Discussion > Local Fishing
Register FAQ Members List Calendar
Google
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-28-2013, 11:35 PM
tkwalker's Avatar
tkwalker tkwalker is offline
Owner and Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lebanon, Tennessee
Posts: 2,925
Exclamation Here it is From Se. Alexander <'TK><

For Immediate Release

Contact:Jim Jeffries, (202) 224-8816



Alexander, McConnell, Corker, Paul Introduce Legislation to Stop Fishing Restrictions

Alexander says bill will prevent “unreasonable” Corps plan from moving forward, speaks with Secretary of Army, will meet Monday with Assistant Secretary of Army in charge of Corps

***

“To close off the tailwaters to fishing 100 percent of the time would be like keeping the gate down at the railroad crossing 100 percent of the time: The track isn't dangerous when the train isn’t coming, and the tailwaters aren’t dangerous when the water isn’t spilling through the dam.” – Lamar Alexander



WASHINGTON, Feb. 28 – U.S. Senator Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), along with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Senators Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.), today introduced legislation that would stop the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers from restricting fishing in the tailwaters below the Cumberland River dams.



Alexander’s legislation wouldprevent the Corps from enacting its plan, rather than simply delay it, as previously intended, because of the Corps’ continued commitment to move forward.



In addition to introducing the legislation, Alexander spoke by phone today with Secretary of the Army John McHugh, and announced that he will meet Monday with Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works Jo-Ellen Darcy to discuss the Corps’ planned restrictions.



Alexander said the Corps is pushing an “unreasonable plan to restrict fishing below Cumberland River dams that will destroy remarkably good recreational opportunities and many jobs.” The Corps plan would restrict public access to the fishing waters below 10 dams on the Cumberland River.



Alexander continued, “Water spills through the Cumberland River dams less than 20 percent of the time on average. To close off the tailwaters to fishing 100 percent of the time would be like keeping the gate down at the railroad crossing 100 percent of the time: The track isn't dangerous when the train isn’t coming, and the tailwaters aren’t dangerous when the water isn’t spilling through the dam.”



The senator, who is the senior Republican on the Senate committee overseeing Corps funding, also said that he “wanted to know exactly where the $2.6 million that the Corps plans to use to erect physical barriers is coming from during these tight budget times.” Alexander said Congress may also need to consider whether the funding required for the barrier system is in the best interest of the American taxpayer.



State officials have said safety concerns can be addressed by anglers adhering to current requirements, and by making changes to policy that would be far less restrictive than the Corps’ plan. Alexander has called on the Corps to reconsider its position, in the hopes that a compromise could find a way to better address safety concerns only when the waters are dangerous.



# # #
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2013, 11:51 PM
Aquaholic6801
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It all sounds good, but what we have to think about now is at what level of water flow is dangerous.....because there is water flowing through some part of the Dam most of the time, which is what attracts a lot of the fish.....because I think there is going to be some restriction at certain flow rates (CFS)..... But whats the cut off CFS going to be.......?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-01-2013, 06:05 AM
MNfisher's Avatar
MNfisher MNfisher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquaholic6801 View Post
It all sounds good, but what we have to think about now is at what level of water flow is dangerous.....because there is water flowing through some part of the Dam most of the time, which is what attracts a lot of the fish.....because I think there is going to be some restriction at certain flow rates (CFS)..... But whats the cut off CFS going to be.......?
I was wondering the same thing, except for Center Hill dam, when no water is moving, the fishing usually sucks!
__________________
Keep Livin' the Dream!

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-01-2013, 12:49 PM
old sailor old sailor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Gordonsville tn
Posts: 212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquaholic6801 View Post
It all sounds good, but what we have to think about now is at what level of water flow is dangerous.....because there is water flowing through some part of the Dam most of the time, which is what attracts a lot of the fish.....because I think there is going to be some restriction at certain flow rates (CFS)..... But whats the cut off CFS going to be.......?
That bothered me also ; I never liked the train analogy the senator loves to use. It could give the Corps too much freedom and end badly.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Site best viewed at 1280X1024
© FishingTN.com