FishingTN.com Tennessee's Fishing and Boating Community

Go Back   FishingTN.com Tennessee's Fishing and Boating Community > General Discussion > Sports Lounge - General
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-25-2014, 01:34 PM
goreds.king's Avatar
goreds.king goreds.king is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: White House, TN
Posts: 233
Default 109 Demolition

Neat clip of the 109 bridge demolition. Not sure if they are removing all or most of the bridge from the water…would make for some good structure.

http://www.tennessean.com/story/news...ridge/8147683/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-25-2014, 03:57 PM
TNBronzeback TNBronzeback is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 1,796
Default

Thats pretty cool! a little flash, big boom and the whole thing drops right down! be some pretty good Sauger water if they leave it there.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-25-2014, 07:48 PM
Halli's Avatar
Halli Halli is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Hermitage
Posts: 901
Default

The new one sure is a fine looking piece of real estate
I cross it a couple times a month heading home from KY via 31 to 109.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-27-2014, 11:05 PM
TNhunter TNhunter is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 14
Default

The new bridge is a little ridiculous. What's up with that divider in the middle of the bridge - looks like that's just waiting for an accident to split a car in half. The $29 million could have been much lower if they would have just built a bridge over it instead of something that looks like it fits in the middle of a large city.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-28-2014, 12:47 AM
tkwalker's Avatar
tkwalker tkwalker is offline
Owner and Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lebanon, Tennessee
Posts: 2,925
Question Uh Kenny ?? <'TK><

Quote:
Originally Posted by TNhunter View Post
The new bridge is a little ridiculous. What's up with that divider in the middle of the bridge - looks like that's just waiting for an accident to split a car in half. The $29 million could have been much lower if they would have just built a bridge over it instead of something that looks like it fits in the middle of a large city.

Kenny, I think what you are seeing is the temporary Lane barriers while the are completing the other two lanes ...


Now please explain this statement ?? .The $29 million could have been much lower if they would have just built a bridge over it instead of something that looks like it fits in the middle of a large city.

I think it is a very beautiful bridge .. Entry gates, Light post.. What do you have against small cities .....I have driven over the old bridge for 40 years and I think it is a greatly needed improvement and especially the elegance of yester Year ... I really don't understand "building a bridge over it ??" <'TK><
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-28-2014, 01:22 AM
Andy M's Avatar
Andy M Andy M is offline
Fisher of men
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Portland,TN
Posts: 36
Default

I live in Portland and as soon as the 109 bypass is complete (4 lanes from I65-I40) the traffic flow will pick tremendously. The bridge will be a critical part of that. When there is heavy traffic or major accidents around nashville I hate to know what traffic will be like on 109 but that's part of growth I guess. I'm really interested to see what will happen for those of us who fish out of Bull Creek and turn on 109. For those turning toward Wilson Cty it could be very dangerous. To answer the other question, the metal framing was removed and sitting on barges before we blasted off Saturday morning, there wouldn't have been enough underwater clearance for barge traffic to be safe is what I was told.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-28-2014, 05:41 AM
Dakota's Avatar
Dakota Dakota is offline
Dakota S
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mt Juliet
Posts: 1,500
Default

I heard on the news they are removing the bridge that sunk. Hopefully some will b left behind.?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-28-2014, 05:49 AM
SAMBOLIE SAMBOLIE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Nashville, Tn
Posts: 1,657
Default

$29 million is a bargain. Karl Dean would spend that much on the AMP if he could. Then he would raise property taxes to keep it running for only a few riders each day.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-28-2014, 09:21 PM
wormdunker wormdunker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMBOLIE View Post
$29 million is a bargain. Karl Dean would spend that much on the AMP if he could. Then he would raise property taxes to keep it running for only a few riders each day.
If it was in Nashville, it would have been 290,000,000, property taxes would have to go up, and it would be a toll bridge.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-13-2014, 10:21 AM
fastjim11 fastjim11 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Springfield, tn
Posts: 17
Default

Property taxes.....why I moved to Robertson county.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Site best viewed at 1280X1024
© FishingTN.com