FishingTN.com Tennessee's Fishing and Boating Community

Go Back   FishingTN.com Tennessee's Fishing and Boating Community > Fishing Discussion > Local Fishing
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Google
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 08-22-2014, 05:18 PM
Alphahawk's Avatar
Alphahawk Alphahawk is offline
Master Trout Magnet
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Columbia, TN
Age: 73
Posts: 5,490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nailman_83 View Post
You actually want a lower frequency in deep water. Most deep water sonars are 200/50 instead of 200/83.

If you look at Alphas last picture of his original post you will see the thermocline and the picture will be fuzzy. I only use 455 because it works better deep and has better coverage shallow. Sometime I will switch to 800 if I want a better image of structure but when I'm fishing I only use the 455.
I assumed, and I was talking about area of coverage for side imaging. I think everyone knows the lower the frequency the deeper the signal can travel...but deep is a relative term and way too many variables come into play here. The 455 shoots out at 180 degrees and the 800 is approximately 130 degrees. The deeper the water the more area covered with the 800 beam say versus at 6 foot depth. No way will the 800 kHz signal shoot say 100 feet straight out to the side and return an image in 2 feet of water at the 100 foot range. But if you are in 80 feet of water it will go quite a ways out down in the water column and give you a better detail image. Since the 800 kHz has not been working on my unit I have no real world experience with it except for yesterday. But I will test it out thoroughly in the next few months. I usually keep my si range out to about 75 feet max and most of the time only about 55 feet. The 455 kHz has served me very well so far but I really do prefer the better images from 800 kHz. Time will tell which one I use most. I still think it interesting that from forums on the net where the Australians chime in they all tend to use the 800 kHz settings. I know the top gurus of Humminbird keep their units set on 455 kHz...that being Humminbird Greg and Doug Vahernberg. I also know one can get their head wrapped too tight in the theory of this stuff...LOL. While if I had the money I am sure I would have all the top of the line stuff with real CHIRP in the 2d and side imaging. But that is a lot of money...and a lot more hardware...way too much hardware for a kayak....LOL.


Regards
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-22-2014, 05:19 PM
Alphahawk's Avatar
Alphahawk Alphahawk is offline
Master Trout Magnet
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Columbia, TN
Age: 73
Posts: 5,490
Default

nailman what unit do you have?


Regards
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-22-2014, 06:11 PM
nailman_83's Avatar
nailman_83 nailman_83 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hendersonville, TN
Posts: 128
Default

998c si.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-22-2014, 06:21 PM
Alphahawk's Avatar
Alphahawk Alphahawk is offline
Master Trout Magnet
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Columbia, TN
Age: 73
Posts: 5,490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nailman_83 View Post
998c si.
That extra inch of screen makes a world of difference.


Regards
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-22-2014, 06:24 PM
nailman_83's Avatar
nailman_83 nailman_83 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hendersonville, TN
Posts: 128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alphahawk View Post
That extra inch of screen makes a world of difference.





Regards

Yep but I'm ready to step up to the Onix.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-22-2014, 07:18 PM
XxthejuicexX's Avatar
XxthejuicexX XxthejuicexX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Murfreesboro
Age: 41
Posts: 3,076
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alphahawk View Post
That extra inch of screen makes a world of difference.


Regards
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Micheal scott .jpg (18.9 KB, 43 views)
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-22-2014, 09:48 PM
MNfisher's Avatar
MNfisher MNfisher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,592
Default

Lol!


Mike
__________________
Keep Livin' the Dream!

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-22-2014, 10:17 PM
TroutFiend's Avatar
TroutFiend TroutFiend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Watertown
Posts: 758
Default

Bahaaa!!!

Good one juice, I miss Mr. Scott.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-22-2014, 11:03 PM
TNBronzeback TNBronzeback is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 1,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
Here's a good 455 versus 800 you can see the 800 seems to be a little sharper image. 800 is on the bottom. Found this online



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Geeze that is amazing! Its like a picture!
I think i could sacrafice some cone diameter in shallower water to get a sharper image like the bottom picture.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 PM.


Site best viewed at 1280X1024
© FishingTN.com